Tearing Down the House

sylvia_browne_montel_williams

Imagine that you owned a house, and you discovered what might be a serious problem with its construction.  This is a problem that you yourself are not qualified to deal with – let’s say that it’s some combination of engineering and local construction code which only someone with intense training and experience could competently solve.  You call a contractor, or an engineer, someone who professes and certifies their expertise in exactly this sort of matter.  You pay this person to inspect the damage and give their honest opinion, and recommend a way forward.  They tell you bad news – not only is this damage severe, you must tear down your whole house.  There’s no way around it.  You ask why and they tell you ‘it’s just how it is, I know, because I’m an engineer.’  What else could you say?  In the interest of your family’s safety and obeying the law – you tear down your home, presumably to move into an apartment nearby.  Maybe you have to money to rebuild, maybe you don’t.

Let’s say that down the road, in about six months, you find out that not only was your house not unsafe, but no laws requiring it to be torn down even exist, and your engineer was lying.  They did this to your face, in a public setting and in an official capacity, and they were wrong.  Would that person not be responsible?  Imagine that this house was in the family for years – wouldn’t that kind of willful fraud be a crime?  Isn’t it a gross violation of trust and common decency to profess expertise that one does not have, with the knowledge that people will make decisions on your advice which could impact their lives and those of their family?

Continue reading

Education and Open Source Art

TI5xNm5

Before Les Misérables and its story of youthful, futile rebellion fades again into popular irrelevance, I thought I’d share this sweet digital painting.  This scene, with its striking red flag, was composed in response to yesterday’s police incursion into a peaceful demonstration outside a government summit on education, after protesters threw snowballs at them. Through all the chunky and kinetic faux-brushstrokes, it shows an invincible and imposing police on horseback, riding roughshod over students who can do little but wave their banners and retreat.

I highly recommend a browse through this gallery of digital paintings by the same anonymous artist (the blog is maintained by his wife) who gives full credit to Quebec’s militant underground for supplying the inspiration and subject matter for the work. They have the stated goal “of supporting, with images, the fight against neo-liberalism which is eroding Quebec society.”  The images and text are free for all to use, no copyrights, no licensing, no advertisements, no ‘Click to Subscribe.’  No linkbait.  No Kickstarter.

In an age when student activists in America turn out in droves to support a sitting US president who believes it within the power of his office to ignore his own secret intelligence courts regarding privacy and assassination orders, it’s good to know the Quebecois are keeping the (always popular and effective) black bloc alive with snowball fights and some creative commons agitprop. No physical media exists for these images, so don’t even think about co-opting this movement to decorate your corporate cafe wall and advance your profit-motive, pig. This art is for the people, by which we mean people with the internet and a computer, and electricity.

Sure I want educators running education.  Also, I sure don’t like compulsory edicts regarding thought and ‘correct’ historical cirricula. But as long as we have the internet, and it’s filled with free art and information, maybe it doesn’t matter? We’ll always have teachers, but will our kids need schools at all?  Are we all certain that the revolutionary spirit demands I take a baton to the face to protest standardized math testing for 3rd graders?  Am I really the enemy because I think there is a better way?

Educators: When technology empowers the individual so spectacularly, why obsess on industrial-age pedagogy and large-scale daycare, when the next generation will live and work entirely online? Neo-liberals: Why bother trying to bend the system to your will, when there are means to educate outside of public walls and property taxes and mandatory lesson plans? Anarchists: Why fight the state, when (if) you can work around it?

Our schools reflect our culture, and right now they are kid factories that short-track the privileged and enforce mediocrity on the rest.  Meanwhile, kids nowadays write as many words in a month than Thomas Jefferson wrote in his entire life. Popular literacy has a new domain: the air.  Teachers deserve our solidarity, because they do the hard work of educating our nation.  But they need to innovate, they need technology to do so, and they need to free students to learn efficiently and without staid biases and obsolete physical and disciplinary boundaries.  The June Rebellion was a failure.  So was Occupy.  They failed because the people as a whole cannot engage in large-scale bureaucratic reform through protest.  Only two things drive reliable, lasting revolutionary change: technology, and access to that technology for everyday people.  When art and information are free, humanity is free.

NO WIFI, NO PEACE.

The Redistribution of Fish

Takin' yo fish for his homies in the yoonyuns.

Legendary libertarian economist Thomas Sowell wrote a little reminder to America that redistributionisms (like public schools and food stamps) always end in massive poverty like Soviet Russia, WHERE FOOD STAMPS YOU.

He starts his article on Obama’s “recently” “uncovered” appearance at a conference at Loyola “University” in “1998″ where the future President admitted to being pro-Communism/a Democrat.  Sowell, like everyone else, acknowledges that the video is not remotely important or interesting, or news. He conflates the young Obama’s (characteristically two-sided and critical) support for the Chicago public housing authority and school system with a Bolshevik kleptocracy, then reminds people of the shittyness of Soviet Russia and Castro’s Cuba, but as usual, neglects the redistributive dystopias of Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, France, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Norway, Finland, and the United States.

And he can’t resist the perfect libertarian metaphor of how “if you give a man a fish, he eats for a day, [etc.]”  That ditty never really connects, however, when you think about how if you teach him to fish instead, you’re out of a job.  So if you want real Economic Freedom®, you’ve gotta let the people who know how to fish keep catching fish and selling the fish, but don’t take that fish and give it to someone for free! ‘Cause that’ll make them full now but poor forever.  And don’t take a fish and give it to a teacher in return for teaching kids to fish, cause then we’ll all have too much fish, I guess? Bottom line is don’t take my fucking fish or I’ll move to Luxembourg.

A man without an education

Thomas Sowell is obviously a great mind, but this tried-and-true argument still leaves out the fact that those who are ‘redistributed to’ are mostly meant to be children or the mothers of children; that by helping them survive and attend school, the state generates a wide base for the development of new human capital in the future. The fish goes to a young fisherman who lives another day to learn to fish himself and teach another generation, and so on.

The John Galt threat is undermined by how selfish it is to let a child go hungry or illiterate because she’s someone else’s responsibility.

No Apologies Ever

Oh Ann, I’ll always remember you as my first true hate.

Remember how when Bush was President and there was a massive catastrophe orchestrated by Islamic terrorists? I remember most people saying it was because they hated our freedoms, and folks who said it was our foreign policy that led to public anger against the USA were called traitorous America-haters. I have to draw attention to how:

a) folks like Romney and Bachmann are not being called traitors by liberals like conservatives did to us from 2001-2008

b) how liberals aren’t making an argument that our policies (which include two wars) caused these uprisings the way we did in 2001

c) none of that matters.

These riots are caused by unemployment in the Arab world, and they were drummed up by religious and political leaders who, after the Arab Spring, are faced with actually solving the problems of their constitutencies instead of fomenting anger against the establishment. This will work for a while, but eventually the Arab world will need to look inward and figure out how to create a civil society.

And eventually Americans will stop expecting to automatically disagree with people who subscribe to different parties and fiscal persuasions, especially when clear enemies like religious extremists strike out against our principles and those who serve to advance our interests abroad.

The Virtue of Selfishness

Contradictions do not exist.

The greatest thing ever courtesy of Dan Lacey

This painting is currently on auction at eBay. Current bid is $63.00. (Terms of service forbids me from admitting if that bid is mine.)

Image

Christopher Hitchens, 1949 – 2011

Christopher Hitchens, Author and Skeptic, Dies.

Continue reading

#OccupyLA: Eviction and the Detention of Tyson Heder


I drove myself down to City Hall on Tuesday night to take part in what would probably be the most important political event in our city for a long time.  I live tweeted as much as I could – right up until my Android phone ran out of batteries.  For those of you who thought I may have been arrested or hurt – do not fret.  Yours truly stayed well out of the way of both protesters and the police, I didn’t even yell and scream.  I just wanted to be there to show support for all involved, and to witness and document a moment in history.

Continue reading